one. GE features a A great deal greater creation capability. They might produce locomotives considerably faster than EMD As well as in much larger numbers.

But could this be for the reason that GE's were being labored more difficult? GE's took the area of many Alco's in hefty lugging support that could have worn them out speedier. Also, GE's have been minority units on many roadways for quite some time, indicating that may not have received proper treatment and overhauls as EMD's did. We all know how minority Alco's, Baldwin, and FM models had been often retired early to reduce spare areas inventories. (This protection, I know, is kind of debatable)

Any info that you'd like to share on operational variances, crew preference, basic safety and comfort, financial system and dependability and of course your typical views are welcomed and appreciated.

observe put on. The radial truck cuts down the weight transfer that occurs For the reason that couplers with a loco are attached to your body. Hence, the trucks are practically attempting to get out kind underneath the loco body at certain moments.

Author: texchief1 Yeah, I can not see why the SC44s have this kind of low engineer seating. I might be prety unpleasant running a type of.

Since the max amperage score is predicated on 8th notch Procedure, this decreases the amperage restrictions of EMD traction motors. GE, Then again, utilizes individual AC motors that provide cooling air towards the traction motors whatever the throttle location. This is amongst the explanations GE models have larger TE and amperage restrictions than EMD designs.

I do think the jury's even now out on that summary. GE has redesigned their radial truck to handle some upkeep problems, plus the new edition must accomplish plus the EMD R truck. They are, In spite of everything, created to do the same factor.

Only some several years Later on, EMD had increased its current market share to 70-90% occasionally. Why? The solution is simple. A several years of operating practical experience had delivered sturdy evidence that EMD locomotives ended up much more responsible and, All round, cheaper to operate when compared to the Competitiveness. This enabled EMD to take care of industry dominance for more than 40 decades.

In fact NO! The EMD-503982 long on-going fantasy would be that the railroads "failed to like them", having said that internal EMD records show that lots of, Quite a few railroads needed to get them. The actual problem was in the main Locomotive Division on the EMD McCook plant. Not like the F Units and E Models, once the BL2 underframe was rotated right-aspect-up, it could now not be moved in the assembly region mainly because of the design and style from the carbody.

Creator: DevalDragon I seen loads of remarks about the minimal engineer seating on The brand new Siemens locomotives - have we neglected about the motive force's compartment on a standard commuter cab car or truck? [ Reply To This Information ] [ Quotation ]

GE's Micro Sentry system, which was introduced in the course of manufacture of the Dash 8 line, is additionally intended within the concept of managed creep, so there isn't any variation during the intent of The 2 devices.

There seems to be a curious anti-GE emotion from a vast majority of the railfan Group. In the next write-up, I'll tackle this concern.

(Let me say very first that I like EMD far better from a railfan standpoint, but I haven't got a certain emotional attachment to either 1)

Purely speculation. EMD-503982 A great deal depends on cylinder head design, scavenging, and auxiliary losses. It's too soon to inform, due to the fact both equally builders are still refining their layouts. Specified the previous capacity of each builders to match EMD-503982 one other in gas efficiency, I might phone it a draw.